Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX?
From: Nancy Kramer <nekramer () mindtheater net>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:43:06 -0500
I think in that situation you should consult a competent attorney and make sure you have some money in the bank to support you for awhile and pay the attorney's fees.
The people on this list are supposed to know about computer security not business liability law which is what this email pertains too. Most of the people on this list are probably as bad at being attorneys as attorneys would be at being security consultants. I did desktop support for attorneys for awhile and believe be most are not "good" with computers even real smart ones who graduated from Harvard and Stanford which some of my users had done.
Regards, Nancy Kramer At 03:01 PM 3/11/2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
The flaws harm investors, they harm the public, they harm information security in general. They are unethical. You inform the company that the flaws exist, and nothing is done about them. Instead, you're slowly but forcefully pushed out of the company.You've signed an NDA. What do you do?
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.2 - Release Date: 3/11/2005 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Fwd: NDA & SOX? Christoph Gruber (Mar 11)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Jason Coombs (Mar 11)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Rob (Mar 12)
- RE: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Aditya Deshmukh (Mar 12)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Nancy Kramer (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Jason Coombs (Mar 12)
- Re: Fwd: NDA & SOX? Jason Coombs (Mar 11)
