Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:25:42 -0500
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:39:19 GMT, Dinis Cruz said:
Finally, you might have noticed that whenever I talked about 'managed code', I mentioned 'managed and verifiable code', the reason for this distinction, is that I discovered recently that .Net code executed under Full Trust can not be (or should not be) called 'managed code', since the .Net Framework will not verify that code (because it is executed under Full Trust). This means that I can write MSIL code which breaks type safety and execute it without errors in a Full Trust .Net environment.
I'm not sure which is stronger at the moment, the "that's scary" implications or the "why did they *bother*?" implications....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code, (continued)
- Re: Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Joe Ciechanowski (Mar 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IEvulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Saqib Ali (Mar 31)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 25)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pilon Mntry (Mar 26)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Christopher Bergström (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 28)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 29)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pilon Mntry (Mar 26)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 28)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code michaelslists (Mar 28)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Andrew van der Stock (Mar 28)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code michaelslists (Mar 28)
- Java integer overflows (was: a really long topic) Andrew van der Stock (Mar 28)
- Re: Java integer overflows (was: a really long topic) michaelslists (Mar 28)
- Re: Re: Java integer overflows (was: a really long topic) Eliah Kagan (Mar 28)
- Re: Re: Java integer overflows (was: a really long topic) michaelslists (Mar 28)
