Re: Britain to improve security?

["Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>]

While you are all wondering how to fix the technical issues of such a
ban, I'm wondering more about the philosophical implications. Does
Britain plan to be regulating human nature? If not, there will be no
end to such bans.

On Dec 14, 2007 4:01 AM, Julio Canto <jcanto () hispasec com> wrote:
> Peter Evans escribió:
> > Brian Loe (knobdy () gmail com) wrote:
> > > As sent from another list member:
> > > We predicted it...
> > > Now it samuai swords.
> > > http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2237699,00.html
> >
> >       Cheap + Genuine are in this case mutually exclusive.
> >
> >       It seems that this one bans the cheap ones and allows the genuine
> >       ones. How are they going to tell the difference?
> >
> >       (yes, the professionals can, but they going to train customs need exercise?)
> >
> >
> >       Next up, they will be banning cheap kitchen knives ...
>
> Banning Katanas individually sounds like a not very smart move. There's
> _plenty_ of 'hand-to-hand' weapons. Will they go next for no-dachis,
> claymores, etc. individually? Is there not laws like controlling weapons
> with one or other characteristic? (lenght of blade or whatever)
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Julio Canto | VirusTotal.com | Hispasec Sistemas Lab | Tlf:
> +34.902.161.025 | Fax: +34.952.028.694 | PGP Key ID: EF618D2B |
> jcanto () hispasec com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.