Re: Juror's response from the RIAA 222k lawsuit

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 10/10/07, Jon O. <jono () networkcommand com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:15:43PM -0400, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
> > On 10/10/07, Larry Seltzer <Larry () larryseltzer com> wrote:
> > > Maybe this isn't the kind of story you want to copy in its entirety to a
> > > mailing list.
> >
> > Did I hit my word count limit again? :-)
>
> You better ask Wired about that to ensure you don't get sued, right?
>
> I think Larry is making a point about infringement -- Music copied results
> in huge fines by jurors who think it's not possible to "spoof" a web
> transaction; you have also infringed by posting an entire article to a list,
> thereby circumventing the "thou shall not republish" agreement most news sites
> have. Of course, posting to a list "to engage in discussion" is fair-use, but
> Larry still has a point -- these lines of distinction about what is ok and what
> isn't are blurred and that is causing some people to restrict their actions
> (not posting entire articles, not making backups of copyrighted things, etc.).

All my posts are in the beta phase, just like google news...
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.