Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
RE: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute
From: FMartins () pt imshealth com (Lisbon)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 19:03:05 +0200
Hi2all, Well ... the last issue to clear now its just detailing just a little more what i really did in the personal example i had give. I just want to clear this ... i just use commom URL's like http://www.badserver.net/...../whatever/ (no res:// or files:// ...just http://, the DNS and his folders) and when i saw files i did just a litle Save Target As, so its just a commom navigation with a commom browser ... I indeed had intentionally try to get access, but just of what was accessible normaly by the browser, nothing more nothing left. So, what i did wrong? ... and where is the hack that i was accused? Those files were accessible to ANYONE, i just point it out by copying some ... After all, this is just a question that involves only me, so i'll not take more of your time. I did reply in the 1st place because of this issue: most of the times when people talk about cyber law, they only talk about what is it in US laws forgeting that Internet is not the same as US internets (probably, they even dont know why the "I" and the "i" i had use here) Just want to thanks John this nice little chat we had here, take care =;o) Kind Regards, Fernando Martins P.S. - Whats a lawyer if not a law cracker? Yeah ... think a little, think a lot, there is no other answer!
Current thread:
- Re: RE: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute JohnNicholson () aol com (Oct 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute JohnNicholson () aol com (Oct 12)
- Re: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute Jim Duncan (Oct 12)
- RE: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute Lisbon (Oct 13)
- Re: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute JohnNicholson () aol com (Oct 13)
- RE: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute Lisbon (Oct 13)
- RE: legality of sacrificial host to prosecute Lisbon (Oct 13)
