Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Re: a novice question. -reply
From: Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mark.Teicher () predictive com)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:43:46 -0800
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au If a signature is not enabled, it should deny the packet it recognizes or at the firewall or router level, anything that is not explicitly permitted should be denied. /m "Keith R. Jarvis" <kjarvis () iss net> Sent by: owner-ids () uow edu au 03/26/00 01:07 PM To: ids () uow edu au cc: Subject: Re: IDS: a novice question. Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au Robert Graham wrote:
--- "RajKumar S." <raj2569 () yahoo com> wrote:since the performance of an IDS system can be improved if the number of attack signature can be reduced.This is generally a myth: reducing the number of attack signatures will
rarely
have any effect on purformance.
This is a good point and I'm glad someone made it. In fact a number of IDS's will detect a disabled signature but trash the event before it reaches the console or log/DB since its such a negligible performance hit. Another situation that argues against disabling signatures or auto-configuring the IDS like NetProwler or Arms are attacks from your network to another. If you don't have any Solaris machines on your network and disable, say, ttdb and cmsd decodes on your IDS, are you not interested if an attacker compromises a machine on your network and begins mass exploiting competitor.com with these attacks? Obviously if you only have enough CPU to watch your systems then first things first, but its an unfortunate compromise. - --krj -- Keith R. Jarvis (kjarvis () iss net) http://xforce.iss.net Internet Security Systems, Inc. +1-678-443-6149 (direct) Adaptive Network Security for the Enterprise +1-678-443-6479 (fax) ISS Connect 2000 March 19-24, 2000 http://connect.iss.net
Current thread:
- Re: a novice question., (continued)
- Re: a novice question. Keith R. Jarvis (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. Keith R. Jarvis (Mar 27)
- The TCP Flags Playground Ofir Arkin (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. Keith R. Jarvis (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Jackie Chan (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Stuart Staniford-Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Ron Gula (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Jesse Nelson (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Ron Gula (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Stuart Staniford-Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Ron Gula (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply JohnNicholson () AOL COM (Mar 28)
- RE: a novice question. -reply Meritt, Jim (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 29)
