Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Re: a novice question. -reply
From: Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mark.Teicher () predictive com)
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 06:10:39 -0800
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au Yes, I also tend to agree with Ron, that understanding packet analysis and understanding anomalous behavior requires a higher skill set. Having secondary systems in place to ensure that the primary system is monitoring everything correctly is one step closer to having a well-planned, well-thought out security architecture. The other question is what is the definition of a "Security guru" I tend to see that word used but haven't met many of them... Can you provide a list of for those of us who aspire to become one can somehow pick the brains of a security guru ??:) (Tongue in cheek ) /mark Ron Gula <rgula () securitywizards com> 03/28/00 08:54 AM To: Mark.Teicher () predictive com cc: ids () uow edu au Subject: Re: IDS: a novice question. -reply
Each IDS system that has been mentioned has shortcomings. Dragon is vastly different from ISS RealSecure. Dragon has other issues that far beyond some of the nuances that ISS RealSecure has. The current version of Dragon still needs drastic improvement in order to even make a dent in the IDS market segment. Dragon still requires a high level of TCP/IP expertise and other skills not commonly known by monitor monkeys. So comparing Dragon to ISS RealSecure is like apples to oranges. :)
I agree. In many cases, we have been able to go into ISS shops and sell them several Dragon sensors for added forensics analysis. BTW, there are many shops out there who run more than one type of IDS. The entry level operators tend to use ISS, while the security gurus tend to use Dragon. In many cases though, as people get more used to packet analysis and the types of traffic on their network, they use Dragon. It's still a learning curve. As for making dents in the IDS market, I'd say we've caused a few black eyes to the competition. There is nothing better than having your competition go into some of your key accounts, hook up their software to the network and watch the CPU peg to 100%. Ron Gula, CTO Network Security Wizards
Current thread:
- Re: a novice question. -reply, (continued)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Jackie Chan (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Stuart Staniford-Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Ron Gula (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Jesse Nelson (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Ron Gula (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Stuart Staniford-Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 28)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Ron Gula (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply JohnNicholson () AOL COM (Mar 28)
- RE: a novice question. -reply Meritt, Jim (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 29)
- Re: a novice question. -reply Mark.Teicher () predictive com (Mar 26)
