Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives

Re: Hybrid IDS


From: "nmcbss" <nmcbss () btinternet com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 20:01:01 +0100

Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids
FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am a current user of zone labs Zonealarm evaluating it for a individual PC
protection plan to be run at a leading UK bank. Is free really good enough
and what would you recommend instead?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martins, Fernando (Lisbon)" <FMartins () pt imshealth com>
To: <ids () uow edu au>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: IDS: Hybrid IDS


Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids
FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Hi2all

Copied and pasted from the provided link:
"Zone Labs has revolutionized personal Internet security with ZoneAlarm,
which is free for personal and non-profit use"
Also you can take a look at ...
http://www.zonelabs.com/zafreedownload.htm

And also i beleave this will take you to your free copy:

http://hotfiles.zdnet.com/cgi-bin/texis/swlib/hotfiles/downloading.html?Disp

Category=Internet&DispSubcategory=Internet+Tools&DispTitle=ZoneAlarm&refresh

_url=ftp%3A%2F%2Fzdftp%2Ezdnet%2Ecom%2Fpub%2Fprivate%2FsWlIB%2Finternet%2Fin

ternet%5Ftools%2Fzonalarm%2Eexe&Fcode=0015P7&Category=internet&Subcategory=i
nternet%5Ftools&b=zonealarm

What is not free is the new ZoneAlarm Pro, not the ZoneAlarm 2.1 witch is
still free for personal and non-profit use.

Kind Regards,

Fernando Martins

-----Original Message-----
From: mht () clark net [SMTP:mht () clark net]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:39 PM
To: Martins, Fernando (Lisbon); ids () uow edu au
Subject: RE: IDS: Hybrid IDS

Actually ZoneLabs is no longer free..

Please see http://www.zonelabs.com/pressvpsales.htm

At 11:02 AM 9/8/00 +0200, Martins, Fernando (Lisbon) wrote:
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids
FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will
bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Hi2all,

John, if 148k packets/second are not enough, try 300k ... this is a
kind
of
test that i wonder why somebody must said at Defcon "hit me, i can
handle
it
...", or something like it. Or Defcon is not what i think it is, or
people
motivation for tests are too low ... but i never been at Defcon so may
be
i'm wrong.

Mark, if you want to test your IDS without even have to go to Defcon,
pick a
big IRC network, create a # for your IDS support on-line, and tell to #
operators to go to some nasty other #'s, and say 'hit me, i can handle
it
...", or something like it.

While i was trying to help Signal9 at Undernet in same kind of tests
for
their ConSeal Firewall, i had not ever the need for challenging nobody,
since 'challengers' were allways around, and i was there almost 24/7
for
their amusement. And beleave me ... one day, if 300k were not enough,
somebody will use more then that and 'something' will crash ... just a
guess, but with luck you can get an 'hybrid' crash eheheh (i luv
English
classes here!!).

I was betatesting BlackICE, but during the trial period i didn't have
the
time for real tests. Also, i wonder why it stops working before the
trial
period was over ... Without time and without the trial version i had
stop
what i probably not even started, at least for real. I have not the
time
as
i use to, for this kind of things (like working for free while others
getting the money), but i can give a try if Xmas arrive in September
this
year and i got a BlackICE copy for free =;o)

And Mark, about Zonelabs market place, yours will never be the same,
since
Zonelabs have other commercial politic for home users, it's free,
remember?

Kind Regards,
Fernando Martins


-----Original Message-----
From: John S Flowers [SMTP:jflowers () hiverworld com]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:29 AM
To:   mark.teicher () networkice com
Cc:   FOCUS-IDS () securityfocus com; ids () uow edu au
Subject:      Re: IDS: Hybrid IDS

Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids
FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will
bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Mark,

I've had a message into Robert Graham and cc'd other persons for the
last 2 weeks or so.  I've sent numerous messages commenting on the
challenge and even replied to the document entitled "jolt2" that was
sent by Robert to myself and others.

In reference to the document -
http://www.robertgraham.com/op-ed/jolt2
-- On August 24th I said, "I like what you've written (jolt2) and
think
you should publish it."

I believe that the claims made by Robert Graham are so outrageous
that
there's no real need to even validate them (see the link above, if
it's
even active).  I'm sure that everyone will see this to be the case
if
this document actually makes it to the public.

Otherwise, I'm more than happy to actually run a real test against
your
IDS and see if it can sustain 148,800 packets per second and provide
alerting/counting on the attack.

This was the original claim made by Robert to the crowd at Defcon
and
to
the IDS list a while ago (i.e. not the single packet against an
invalid
IP address that is mentioned in this document).  This is the claim
that
I believe Robert should stick to, not the "jolt2 test" in the
document
at the link above.

I've not yet received a copy of BlackICE for the purpose of this
real
world test and I haven't heard from Robert since Aug 24th (2 weeks
ago).

For the record -- I've been seriously busy, but I HAVE kept in touch
with Network ICE and Robert Graham since this claim was made.  So
the
accusation that "no one has heard from Hiverworld since" is
completely
misleading.

"Teicher, Mark" wrote:

At 10:02 AM 9/7/00 -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:

One place where the personall firewall / IDS hybrids present an
interesting challenge to clarity is in performance marketing.
Since they're operating at a packet level (sort of) an
unscrupulous
vendor (hi! you know who you are!) could claim their performance
figures in terms of packets processed/second. So the vendor could
say "in recent tests, our network IDS handled 10,000,000,000
packets/second!!" without mentioning clearly that this was
accomplished using a single host on a switch, but the host was
only looking for attacks directed at itself... Such claims have
already been made - clearly deceptive, but there you have it.

Whoa, wait a minute here, Network ICE accepted the challenge from
Hiverworld at DefCon, and Network ICE was ready,  No one has heard
from
HiverWorld since.

Ah yes, Marketing, blame NAI, Symantec and Zonelabs for
re-defining
the
market space or in other words segmenting a very infant market
space.
So
every vendor is attempting fit into as many market spaces as it
can,
in
order to get the largest customer base.

Is there a clear cut definition out there somewhere?

You're asking if marketing respects technical language? <giggle>
I wish...  :(  We went through the same kind of nonsense early
on in the firewall days - proxy firewalls, stateful turbo
multi-whomping packet examination, etc, etc. Eventually terms
settle down when the marketing folks find a set of features
they can tout that don't cause people to break out in belly
laughter whenever they use it.n

I tend to agree with MJR on this space, the marketing type firms
out
there
don't really understand the space or the techie geekie stuff that
some
of
us utter to them.  The tend to grab onto the first one or two
blurbs
of
techie talk and that what they stick with.  You try to explain
them
the
different between packet grepping and protocol decode, they get
all
glossy
eyed and almost fall over from boredom.  The marketing type people
layman
explanations that some of us can never get across to them without
bursting
out laughing.. :)

/mark

mjr.
-----
Marcus J. Ranum
Chief Technology Officer, Network Flight Recorder, Inc.
Work:                  http://www.nfr.net
Personal:              http://www.ranum.com

--
John S Flowers                <jflowers () hiverworld com>
Chief Scientist              http://www.hiverworld.com
510.848.0740 x 724 [Office]         510.841.2447 [Fax]



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.189 / Virus Database: 90 - Release Date: 01/09/00


Current thread: