Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Re: Hybrid IDS
From: "nmcbss" <nmcbss () btinternet com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 20:01:01 +0100
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce. SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am a current user of zone labs Zonealarm evaluating it for a individual PC protection plan to be run at a leading UK bank. Is free really good enough and what would you recommend instead? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martins, Fernando (Lisbon)" <FMartins () pt imshealth com> To: <ids () uow edu au> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 5:04 PM Subject: RE: IDS: Hybrid IDS
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce. SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au --------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Hi2all Copied and pasted from the provided link: "Zone Labs has revolutionized personal Internet security with ZoneAlarm, which is free for personal and non-profit use" Also you can take a look at ... http://www.zonelabs.com/zafreedownload.htm And also i beleave this will take you to your free copy:
http://hotfiles.zdnet.com/cgi-bin/texis/swlib/hotfiles/downloading.html?Disp
Category=Internet&DispSubcategory=Internet+Tools&DispTitle=ZoneAlarm&refresh
_url=ftp%3A%2F%2Fzdftp%2Ezdnet%2Ecom%2Fpub%2Fprivate%2FsWlIB%2Finternet%2Fin
ternet%5Ftools%2Fzonalarm%2Eexe&Fcode=0015P7&Category=internet&Subcategory=i
nternet%5Ftools&b=zonealarm What is not free is the new ZoneAlarm Pro, not the ZoneAlarm 2.1 witch is still free for personal and non-profit use. Kind Regards, Fernando Martins-----Original Message----- From: mht () clark net [SMTP:mht () clark net] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:39 PM To: Martins, Fernando (Lisbon); ids () uow edu au Subject: RE: IDS: Hybrid IDS Actually ZoneLabs is no longer free.. Please see http://www.zonelabs.com/pressvpsales.htm At 11:02 AM 9/8/00 +0200, Martins, Fernando (Lisbon) wrote:Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will
bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Hi2all, John, if 148k packets/second are not enough, try 300k ... this is a
kind
oftest that i wonder why somebody must said at Defcon "hit me, i can
handle
it...", or something like it. Or Defcon is not what i think it is, orpeoplemotivation for tests are too low ... but i never been at Defcon so may
be
i'm wrong. Mark, if you want to test your IDS without even have to go to Defcon,pick abig IRC network, create a # for your IDS support on-line, and tell to # operators to go to some nasty other #'s, and say 'hit me, i can handle
it
...", or something like it. While i was trying to help Signal9 at Undernet in same kind of tests
for
their ConSeal Firewall, i had not ever the need for challenging nobody, since 'challengers' were allways around, and i was there almost 24/7
for
their amusement. And beleave me ... one day, if 300k were not enough, somebody will use more then that and 'something' will crash ... just a guess, but with luck you can get an 'hybrid' crash eheheh (i luv
English
classes here!!). I was betatesting BlackICE, but during the trial period i didn't have
the
time for real tests. Also, i wonder why it stops working before the
trial
period was over ... Without time and without the trial version i had
stop
what i probably not even started, at least for real. I have not the
time
asi use to, for this kind of things (like working for free while others getting the money), but i can give a try if Xmas arrive in September
this
year and i got a BlackICE copy for free =;o) And Mark, about Zonelabs market place, yours will never be the same,sinceZonelabs have other commercial politic for home users, it's free,remember?Kind Regards, Fernando Martins-----Original Message----- From: John S Flowers [SMTP:jflowers () hiverworld com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:29 AM To: mark.teicher () networkice com Cc: FOCUS-IDS () securityfocus com; ids () uow edu au Subject: Re: IDS: Hybrid IDS Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg willbounce.SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark, I've had a message into Robert Graham and cc'd other persons for the last 2 weeks or so. I've sent numerous messages commenting on the challenge and even replied to the document entitled "jolt2" that was sent by Robert to myself and others. In reference to the document -
http://www.robertgraham.com/op-ed/jolt2
-- On August 24th I said, "I like what you've written (jolt2) andthinkyou should publish it." I believe that the claims made by Robert Graham are so outrageous
that
there's no real need to even validate them (see the link above, ifit'seven active). I'm sure that everyone will see this to be the case
if
this document actually makes it to the public. Otherwise, I'm more than happy to actually run a real test againstyourIDS and see if it can sustain 148,800 packets per second and provide alerting/counting on the attack. This was the original claim made by Robert to the crowd at Defcon
and
tothe IDS list a while ago (i.e. not the single packet against aninvalidIP address that is mentioned in this document). This is the claimthatI believe Robert should stick to, not the "jolt2 test" in the
document
at the link above. I've not yet received a copy of BlackICE for the purpose of this
real
world test and I haven't heard from Robert since Aug 24th (2 weeksago).For the record -- I've been seriously busy, but I HAVE kept in touch with Network ICE and Robert Graham since this claim was made. So
the
accusation that "no one has heard from Hiverworld since" is
completely
misleading. "Teicher, Mark" wrote:At 10:02 AM 9/7/00 -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:One place where the personall firewall / IDS hybrids present an interesting challenge to clarity is in performance marketing. Since they're operating at a packet level (sort of) an
unscrupulous
vendor (hi! you know who you are!) could claim their performance figures in terms of packets processed/second. So the vendor could say "in recent tests, our network IDS handled 10,000,000,000 packets/second!!" without mentioning clearly that this was accomplished using a single host on a switch, but the host was only looking for attacks directed at itself... Such claims have already been made - clearly deceptive, but there you have it.Whoa, wait a minute here, Network ICE accepted the challenge from Hiverworld at DefCon, and Network ICE was ready, No one has heardfromHiverWorld since. Ah yes, Marketing, blame NAI, Symantec and Zonelabs for
re-defining
themarket space or in other words segmenting a very infant marketspace.Soevery vendor is attempting fit into as many market spaces as it
can,
inorder to get the largest customer base.Is there a clear cut definition out there somewhere?You're asking if marketing respects technical language? <giggle> I wish... :( We went through the same kind of nonsense early on in the firewall days - proxy firewalls, stateful turbo multi-whomping packet examination, etc, etc. Eventually terms settle down when the marketing folks find a set of features they can tout that don't cause people to break out in belly laughter whenever they use it.nI tend to agree with MJR on this space, the marketing type firms
out
theredon't really understand the space or the techie geekie stuff thatsomeofus utter to them. The tend to grab onto the first one or two
blurbs
oftechie talk and that what they stick with. You try to explain
them
thedifferent between packet grepping and protocol decode, they get
all
glossyeyed and almost fall over from boredom. The marketing type peoplelaymanexplanations that some of us can never get across to them withoutburstingout laughing.. :) /markmjr. ----- Marcus J. Ranum Chief Technology Officer, Network Flight Recorder, Inc. Work: http://www.nfr.net Personal: http://www.ranum.com-- John S Flowers <jflowers () hiverworld com> Chief Scientist http://www.hiverworld.com 510.848.0740 x 724 [Office] 510.841.2447 [Fax]
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.189 / Virus Database: 90 - Release Date: 01/09/00
Current thread:
- Re: Hybrid IDS, (continued)
- Re: Hybrid IDS John S Flowers (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Dragos Ruiu (Sep 08)
- Back to kernel-mode NIDS (was: Hybrid IDS) rob (Sep 16)
- RE: Hybrid IDS mht (Sep 08)
- RE: Hybrid IDS Max Vision (Sep 12)
- RE: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS nmcbss (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mht (Sep 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 12)
- RE: Hybrid IDS mht (Sep 08)
- RE: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
