Intrusion Detection Systems mailing list archives
Back to kernel-mode NIDS (was: Hybrid IDS)
From: "rob" <robert_david_graham () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:53:27 -0700
Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner () uow edu au NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce. SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo () uow edu au -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dragos Ruiu Yep, that was the claim that raised eyebrows... But I've read the claim carefully now and see that it has a lot of err... wiggle room.
I tried to create no wiggle room in the results (so that others can reproduce them), but of course their is enormous room in the interpretation. This is clearly a "synthetic benchmark" with limited applicability to the real world. It started out from a discussion about kernel-mode IDS, and I really didn't want it dragged out into the public in the first place.
...sensor do if I transmit dr's IDS soloflex sequence at it...
You should think of this more as another synthetic benchmark rather than a conclusive death knell for NIDS. Certainly, it will probably kill all NIDS. However, there are defenses. Simply putting rate-filters on fragments entering your network will help the NIDS (rate filtering is becoming extremely popular). You've also got a choice of "normalizing" firewalls that force reassembly, which helps out the NIDS behind it. Also, certain NIDS have deployment options for installation direction on the affected hosts :-) which can likewise help defend against this. If you expect the NIDS to page you each time a hacker breaches your network, then you shouldn't buy one. That isn't what NIDS do. Instead, they provide visibility into what's happening on the network wire, catching scans, pointing out anomalies, and hopefully triggering on the more obvious attacks.
There, that post should put me on the IDS vendor troublemaker lists.... :-) So are there any _real_ IDSes out there?
Troublemakers: Ghandi, Jefferson, Galileo, etc. :-) Robert Graham CTO, Network ICE __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- Re: Hybrid IDS, (continued)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Talisker (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Dan Nadir (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Dragos Ruiu (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Talisker (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS John S Flowers (Sep 07)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS Dragos Ruiu (Sep 08)
- Back to kernel-mode NIDS (was: Hybrid IDS) rob (Sep 16)
- RE: Hybrid IDS mht (Sep 08)
- RE: Hybrid IDS Max Vision (Sep 12)
- RE: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS nmcbss (Sep 08)
- Re: Hybrid IDS mht (Sep 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Hybrid IDS mark . teicher (Sep 12)
