Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found.
From: "Kolde, Jennifer E." <jkolde () nosc mil>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:59:33 -0800
Note that McAfee VirusScan (v7.1 Enterprise, not sure about others) includes an option to "Find potentially unwanted programs". If this option is selected (it is disabled by default) then McAfee will dutifully alert on "suspect" programs such as psexec.exe (from Sysinternals' PSTools). I have not fully tested the range of programs it will detect / not detect - but a quick check shows it will *not* alert on VNC, but it will alert on the Serv-U FTP daemon, for example. My own recent experience is that McAfee does a far better job vs. Symantec/Norton of detecting things (even though neither app is perfect), and the option above is a nice one to have...even if it's not a complete solution. You can always port scan your network to find out who's listening on 5800 (or other port o' choice) and check to make sure those folks *really* mean to be running something on that port. Regards, Jennifer Kolde -----Original Message----- From: John Ives [mailto:jives () cchem berkeley edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:09 PM To: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. There are two answers to this. The first is that it be a default option that can be turned off by support staff. the second is that IT staff could (while building their distribution system eg. ghost images, etc) pre-approve the supported app. Of course, my perspective is always clouded by the realities of supporting people on a university campus. This feature may not be necessary for corporations, but it would help us. John At 06:45 PM 12/17/2003 -0500, Rob Shein wrote:
I can't imagine this concept working. Imagine how users would react if VNC were used in the workplace (as it is in some companies I know of), and it popped up as a possible trojan or sign of compromise, because it's
sometimes
used that way by hackers. End users, who are the majority of people using antivirus solutions, are prone to overreaction and panic, particularly
where
viruses are concerned. While giving the user more information and letting them come to their own conclusion is theoretically the best way, actually implementing that solution is going to cause massive problems from a
support
perspective.-----Original Message----- From: John Ives [mailto:jives () cchem berkeley edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:05 PM To: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. One of the things I have noticed with Symantec (and I am sure other vendors do the same thing) is that files that have both good and bad uses are considered good, no matter how rarely they are used that way. A better system would be a prompt informing the user of the file's name, location and any relevant information about its legitimate uses and asking if this was running intentionally. If so it should take a hash of the file and its directory path, archive that information to a file, digitally sign the file and use it as a reference whenever it does future scans. If it is not intentionally being run then quarantine it and notify the user that, if there are any problems they can un-quarantine the file by doing x y and z. This isn't an absolute answer, because it still relies on the user to make sound decisions, but it would help alleviate problems caused by legitimate files performing illegitimate actions.
------------------------------------------------- John Ives, GCWN, GCIH, GSEC Systems Administrator College of Chemistry (510) 643-1033 "If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, Then you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked." - Richard Clarke Any opinions expressed are my own and not those of the Regents of the University of California. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found., (continued)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. Rob Shein (Dec 18)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. John Ives (Dec 18)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. Harlan Carvey (Dec 17)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. James C Slora Jr (Dec 17)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. Harlan Carvey (Dec 18)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. David Gillett (Dec 18)
- Re: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. Doug Foster (Dec 19)
- Re: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Dec 19)
- Administrivia: Dead Thread - Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. Dan Hanson (Dec 19)
- RE: Strange servicepack.exe file (not service.exe) found. Lucretia (Dec 19)
