nanog mailing list archives
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Spencer.Wood () dot state oh us
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:01:51 -0400
We have done some testing of VoIP across a 802.11b wireless connection,
and it appears to be pretty decent, but it really depends on the quantity
of the wireless connection. The biggest problem we have run across is
jitter...
Spencer
****************************************************
Spencer Wood, Network Administrator
Ohio Department Of Transportation
1320 Arthur E. Adams Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43221
E-Mail: Spencer.Wood () dot state oh us
Phone: 614.644.5422/Fax: 815.361.0714
****************************************************
Eric Whitehill <eric () botbay net>
Sent by: owner-nanog () merit edu
05/29/2001 01:42 PM
To: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
cc: RJ Atkinson <rja () inet org>, <nanog () merit edu>
Subject: RE: QOS or more bandwidth
I know of someone who is trying to do a VOIP system over a wireless
network - they are having limited success, but when they did some packet
switching magic, it seemed to help some, but last I checked they are still
having issues with it dropping calls and the phone system constantly
resetting. Is VOIP really ready for such practices as to allow business
to totally rely on VOIP in this matter?
ok ok a little off topic ;-)
-Eric
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
To: RJ Atkinson <rja () inet org>
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: QOS or more bandwidth
> Whenever I did the cost of deploying and managing fancy
QoS
> and compared it with the cost of getting and managing more
capacity,
> it was always MUCH MUCH cheaper to get and manage more capacity
> than to mess with more QoS.
We did one VoIP network deployment, and I tried each of the different
QoS
services in IOS at that time (about 18 months ago) both in the lab and
in
the field, and more bandwidth was the answer then.
-Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Wayne Bouchard (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidthy Rafi Sadowsky (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Nathan Stratton (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Rafi Sadowsky (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Nathan Stratton (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Randy Bush (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
