nanog mailing list archives
Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () robotics net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 18:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
Hi Sorry about the previous (content free :-( ) Email May I suggest reading (and following links from) <http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-mlppp.html> (Scanning for "cRTP" & "Interleaving" should be useful)
Ya, it is funny because cisco was one of the authors of CRTP (RFC 2508) and they don't comply with the RFC on any of their products. CRTP is great, but frankly it does not help at all without other changes. Lets say we have 10 ms sample of G.726 that is 40 bytes + 2 byte CRTP header + 8 byte AAL5, we are still at two cells and just have more space for padding. What I am doing is changing the frame size to odd sizes like 9.5 ms giving me a 38 byte payload + 2 byte CRTP + 8 byte AAL5, fits in one ATM cell. -Nathan
Current thread:
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Robert E. Seastrom (May 30)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Eric A. Hall (May 29)
- Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Nathan Stratton (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Wayne Bouchard (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidthy Rafi Sadowsky (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Nathan Stratton (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Rafi Sadowsky (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Nathan Stratton (May 29)
- Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth Randy Bush (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
