nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking nimda probes with a content-layer switch
From: Lincoln Dale <ltd () interlink com au>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:59:14 -0700
At 12:32 AM 19/09/2001 -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
Has anybody tried to block nimda HTTP GET probes using URL pattern matches in a "layer-4-7"[1] switch?
note that this worm uses multiple methods for spreading - email and HTTP. these methods are only addressing the HTTP side of things:
NBAR (Network Based Application Recognition) in IOS:
existing CodeRed NBAR settings will block the HTTP probes.
see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nbar_acl_codered.shtml
Cisco Content Engine:
rule enable
rule block url-regex http://.*/cmd\.exe
rule block url-regex http://.*/root\.exe
Cisco CSS11K (Content Services switch):
service dummy
ip address 10.1.1.1
keepalive type none
active
!
header-field-group cmd.exe
header-field cmd.exe request-line contain "cmd.exe"
header-field-group root.exe
header-field root.exe request-line contain "root.exe"
!
content block_cmd.exe
protocol tcp
port 80
url "/*"
header-field-rule cmd.exe
add service dummy
active
content block_root.exe
protocol tcp
port 80
url "/*"
header-field-rule root.exe
add service dummy
active
The ideal result is to prevent nimda GET probes from ever reaching the destination address, but causing the session to be reset towards the server after the open handshake but before the GET can be sent to the server would be acceptably useful.
note that only the CSS and the CE in the above will actually prevent the 'tcp syn' from propogating, and they'll establish the tcp 3-way handshake, receive the HTTP headers and then match the request to be an "attack". NBAR will only match the headers on connections that successfully establish a 3-way handshake. (NBAR won't cause the router to spoof the TCP setup - so-called delayed-binding).
cheers, lincoln.
Current thread:
- Blocking nimda probes with a content-layer switch Joe Abley (Sep 18)
- procmail nimda e-mail filter Bryan Bradsby (Sep 18)
- Re: Blocking nimda probes with a content-layer switch Lincoln Dale (Sep 19)
- Re: Blocking nimda probes with a content-layer switch jeff (Sep 19)
