nanog mailing list archives
Re: looping traceroutes
From: Ratul Mahajan <ratul () cs washington edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
>27 208.63.128.3 (208.63.128.3) 111.475 ms 69.670 ms 69.267 ms >28 208.63.128.1 (208.63.128.1) 68.883 ms 67.147 ms 72.106 ms >29 208.63.128.3 (208.63.128.3) 69.842 ms 67.889 ms 66.944 ms >30 208.63.128.1 (208.63.128.1) 70.986 ms 73.124 ms 68.452 ms This looks exactly like a routing loop to me. Why do you think it is not a routing loop?
I was assuming that any routing loop in the system would be transient, but
this one is not (the traceroute is still showing the same behavior). The
extent to which I see this also makes me think that there is something
else going on.
Do you think that it can be a real persistent routing loop (data packets
would actually shuttle between the two interfaces) as against some
wierdness because of traceroute?
thanks,
-- ratul
Current thread:
- looping traceroutes Ratul Mahajan (Sep 18)
- Re: looping traceroutes Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: looping traceroutes Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: looping traceroutes Ratul Mahajan (Sep 19)
- Re: looping traceroutes Stephen Stuart (Sep 19)
- Re: looping traceroutes Leo Bicknell (Sep 19)
- Re: looping traceroutes Nick Feamster (Sep 19)
- Re: looping traceroutes Ratul Mahajan (Sep 19)
- Re: looping traceroutes Marshall Eubanks (Sep 19)
- RE: looping traceroutes Jeb R. Linton (Sep 19)
- RE: looping traceroutes Hire, Ejay (Sep 19)
