nanog mailing list archives
Re: genuity - any good?
From: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall () ihug co nz>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 10:09:02 +1200 (NZST)
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Roy wrote:
1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to register each route you want to advertise rather than allowing you to advertise any reasonable route for your prefixes.
One of our upstreams wanted this so we just ended up sending them every legit network/prefix combo for our main networks (2 * /17) . They end up with over 500 entries in their database and any one time we are only advertising about 20 of them. -- Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: simon.lyall () ihug co nz Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: simon () darkmere gen nz ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
Current thread:
- genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Anthony D Cennami (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Hank Nussbacher (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Hank Nussbacher (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
