nanog mailing list archives
limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?)
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:18:35 +0300 (IDT)
## On 2002-04-12 17:27 -0700 Mark Kent typed:
MK>
MK> To address Sean's point about mistakes turning one /16 into a zillion
MK> entries, is there any way to allow only some specified maximum number
MK> of routes from a bgp neighbor? I know that I'ld be happy if my
MK> upstreams gave me a buffer of, say, 10 entries above my typical number
MK> of aggregates.
MK>
MK> -mark
MK>
MK>
For Cisco IOS just add this under the "router bgp" section
---
neighbor <IP address> maximum-prefix <nnnn>
---
Exceeding the maximum prefix number will shutdown the BGP session until a
manual clear
Enjoy
Rafi
--
Rafi Sadowsky rafi () oumail openu ac il
Network/System/Security VoiceMail: +972-3-646-0592 FAX: +972-3-649-8629
Mangler ( :-) | FIRST-REP for ILAN-CERT(CERT () CERT AC IL)
Open University of Israel | (PGP key -> ) http://telem.openu.ac.il/~rafi
Current thread:
- Re: genuity - any good?, (continued)
- Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) German Martinez (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 15)
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver (Apr 13)
