nanog mailing list archives
Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:34:34 +0000 (GMT)
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
http://in.tech.yahoo.com/041103/137/2ho4i.html According to Reuters, BT is more traffic than web/other forms of traffic? I'm thinking the sampling methodology here might be a little skewed.
1) where was the measurement done? 2) how was the measurement done? 3) what population was sampled? On some networks BT might account for far more than 30%, on others far, far less... Perhaps the writers will answer? -Chris
Current thread:
- BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Deepak Jain (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Tony Li (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Marshall Eubanks (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Petri Helenius (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Marshall Eubanks (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Tony Li (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Bastiaan Spandaw (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christian Kuhtz (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Jeroen Massar (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Matthew S. Hallacy (Nov 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Matt Ryan (Nov 05)
