nanog mailing list archives
Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ?
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 17:00:08 +0100
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 10:44 -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
The commercial tools for classifying deeper than header info a la netflow are out there already, although they may not be as "slick to deploy" as netflow (which brings its own challenges) by turning on knobs in software on existing routing equipment. The limitation is how motivated is the business to deploy the gear, not whether viable equipment exists for exactly that purpose..
And which kind of gear is this, except for boxes which need a mirror of the complete traffic ? There are a couple of NetFlow (9/IPFIX) meters that can additionally to the normal fields can also pass eg the first 100 bytes of a conversation in either direction. But those are also meters on a seperate box and not embedded in the hardware of routers (or is there anything I missed ;) Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Deepak Jain (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Tony Li (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Marshall Eubanks (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Petri Helenius (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Marshall Eubanks (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Tony Li (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Bastiaan Spandaw (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christian Kuhtz (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Jeroen Massar (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Matthew S. Hallacy (Nov 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Matt Ryan (Nov 05)
