nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS for IPv6
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:46:24 +0800
On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote:
So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash, please ask for an LDP6 implementation, "no demand" should not be the case.
I sent our SE's at C & J yet another reminder about this. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Daniel Roesen (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Nathan Ward (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 07)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Julien Goodwin (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 10)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 10)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
