nanog mailing list archives
RE: MPLS for IPv6
From: "David Freedman" <david.freedman () uk clara net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:54:03 -0000
<snip> I suppose MPLS v6 control plane would become necessary at Ph-2, or a later stage of Ph-1. </snip> This is a stupidly simple to implement feature, telling us "we're not ready yet" is not a sensible thing to do, any technology we can have sooner will ease the transition for many people should they choose to implement it. I would be interested to know what your views on this are with your vendor hat on :) Dave.
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mtinka () globaltransit net] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:46 AM To: nanog () nanog org Cc: David Freedman Subject: Re: MPLS for IPv6 On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote:So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash,please ask foran LDP6 implementation, "no demand" should not be the case.I sent our SE's at C & J yet another reminder about this. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: MPLS for IPv6, (continued)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Daniel Roesen (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Nathan Ward (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 07)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Julien Goodwin (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 10)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 10)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
