nanog mailing list archives
Re: Router for Metro Ethernet
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:42:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Jeffrey Negro wrote:
In our case I believe we would be dealing with just static routes and a lines of ACL. Do you think the routing protocols are your largest resource usage in your scenario, or is it also just simple routing as well?
Get a used 3550 or a new 3400ME or something. Sounds likeyuou'll get by just fine using an L3 switch.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet, (continued)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Owen DeLong (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Dennis Burgess (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Owen DeLong (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Murphy, Jay, DOH (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Dylan Ebner (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Christopher J. Pilkington (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Jeffrey Negro (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Kevin Loch (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Dylan Ebner (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Jon Lewis (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Franck Martin (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Holmes,David A (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Brandon Ewing (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Rubens Kuhl (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Tim Franklin (Apr 14)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Frank Bulk (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Owen DeLong (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Jeremy Parr (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Owen DeLong (Apr 13)
