nanog mailing list archives
RE: Router for Metro Ethernet
From: "Dennis Burgess" <dmburgess () linktechs net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:24:58 -0500
They just added IPv6 over PPP Support in v5 too :) ----------------------------------------------------------- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Trainer, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCUME Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS" -----Original Message----- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 11:13 PM To: frnkblk () iname com Cc: nanog () nanog org; 'Bill Stewart' Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet I stand corrected on the Mikrotik... Apparently, while not well documented, they do, indeed support IPv6 and their Wiki even includes tunnel configuration information. Apologies to Mikrotik (and some encouragement to add this to your main-line documentation). Owen On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:56 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
We run a 3845 at over 300 Mbps and it's less than 50% CPU....most
times less
than 30%. No BGP, just OSPF. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Bill Stewart [mailto:nonobvious () gmail com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:27 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dylan Ebner <dylan.ebner () crlmed com> wrote:However, this router also has 2 100mb connections from local lans
that it
is also terminiating.For our 100mb metro e connections we use 3845s. The 100 mb serviceterminates into NM-GEs, which have a faster throughput than the hwics. Be careful using 3845s for 100 Mbps connections or above - Cisco rates them at 45 Mbps (and 3825 at half of that) but last time I checked doesn't make any promises at faster than T3. They're being conservative about it, but one thing that really can burn the horsepower is traffic shaping, which you need with some MetroE carriers. -- ---- Thanks; Bill Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still
experimental so
far. And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.
Current thread:
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet, (continued)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Holmes,David A (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Brandon Ewing (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Rubens Kuhl (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Tim Franklin (Apr 14)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Bill Stewart (Apr 12)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Frank Bulk (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Owen DeLong (Apr 12)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Jeremy Parr (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Owen DeLong (Apr 13)
- RE: Router for Metro Ethernet Dennis Burgess (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Tony Varriale (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Da Shi (Apr 13)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Bill Stewart (Apr 14)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Tony Varriale (Apr 16)
- Re: Router for Metro Ethernet Andrey Khomyakov (Apr 16)
