nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:45:37 +0100
* Thomas Magill:
1. Why don't providers use /31 addresses for P2P links? This works fine per rfc 3021 but nobody seems to believe it or use it. Are there any major manufacturers out there that do not support it?
Not all vendors support it, especially not over Ethernet.
2. Longer than /24 prefixes in global BGP table. The most obvious answer is that some hardware may not handle it...
I think the main problem today is update rate, not actual prefix count. In any case, it seems rather unlikely that less aggregation brings more IP addresses into play. Smaller RIR allocations, perhaps, but beyond the /24 barrier, you'll soon have better global connectivity over IPv6.
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space Andy Davidson (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Tim Durack (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Jeff McAdams (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Chris Adams (Mar 05)
- RE: IP4 Space Thomas Magill (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- RE: IP4 Space Thomas Magill (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Andy Davidson (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
