nanog mailing list archives

Re: NSP-SEC

From: Guillaume FORTAINE <gfortaine () live com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:22:41 +0100

On 03/19/2010 04:52 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote:

Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?

I might argue the "few" comment


Could you argue, if possible, please ?

I look forward to your answer,

Best Regards,

Guillaume FORTAINE

Current thread:

NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
  - Re: NSP-SEC David Conrad (Mar 18)
  - Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 18)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 18)
    - Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Paul WALL (Mar 19)
  - Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Brielle Bruns (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC Jorge Amodio (Mar 19)
  - Re: NSP-SEC Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC John Kristoff (Mar 19)
  - Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
    - Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity bmanning (Mar 19)

(Thread continues...)