nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: John Kristoff <jtk () cymru com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:31:43 -0500
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:43:18 +0100 Guillaume FORTAINE <gfortaine () live com> wrote:
First question : Why was I able to find this mail on the Internet if it should be kept secret ?
nsp-security was originally formed out of the dissatisfaction with other so-called private collaborative channels back when it was formed a number of years ago. There are many more lists and groups that have since formed along the same lines. The existence of nsp-security is no secret and there has been a small number of "leaks", that is, mail primarily, that was not meant to be forwarded or copied outside the list that had been. Its been far from perfect from both a secretive standpoint and policy standpoint, but compared to what existed before it, it has proved useful from time to time. The ISP Security BoF/Track meetings at NANOG grew out of the nsp-security effort and those are open to any NANOG attendee. One thing groups like this has perhaps most helped with is building one-to-one relationships between colleagues. Groups like nsp-security help you to learn who the trusted and reliable contacts are at various organizations. An ongoing area of work is to build better closed, trusted communities without leaks. Its still an ongoing problem. Thats why many times really sensitive work gets done in even smaller ad-hoc groups or on a one-to-one basis. John
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC David Conrad (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Paul WALL (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Brielle Bruns (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Jorge Amodio (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC John Kristoff (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity bmanning (Mar 19)
- RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Green, Tim R (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here]) Larry Sheldon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 20)
