nanog mailing list archives
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:20:22 +0200
this is a matter of risk analysis. No secure routing means we'll continue to see the occasional high profile outage which is dealt with very quickly.
how soon we forget 7007, 128/8, ... over a day each, and global, and very big netowrks. if something like those happen again, we are gonna be spending a lot of time explaining our selves to people who wear funny clothes, and telling them why it is not going to happen again if they let us keep our jobs. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?, (continued)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Zaid Ali (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Hank Nussbacher (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Aaron Glenn (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Joe Abley (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Marshall Eubanks (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 10)
