nanog mailing list archives
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
From: Anton Kapela <tkapela () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:31:18 -0400
On May 9, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://skunkpost.com/news.sp?newsId=2327
"Just how fragile is the internet?" Rhetoric, much? Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking. -Tk
Current thread:
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?, (continued)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Joe Abley (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Marshall Eubanks (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 11)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Danny McPherson (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jorge Amodio (May 10)
