nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
From: Graham Beneke <graham () apolix co za>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 10:56:36 +0200
On 2010/05/14 03:39 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
3) don't tunnel beyond your borders, really just don't
We have managed to achieve that fairly well. We have colocated a single router in a provider in London with native IPv6 where we have our primary break out. We then tunnel over IPv4 between this router and our core.
The tunneling protocol provides transparent L2 frame reassembly so we have MTU 1500 all the way to the edge of the network.
-- Graham Beneke graham () apolix co za | Apolix Internet Services Tel : +27-87-550-1010 | http://www.apolix.co.za/ Cell: +27-82-432-1873 | PO Box 1120 Skype: grbeneke | Melville, 2109
Current thread:
- ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Randy Bush (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Graham Beneke (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jeroen Massar (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 17)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Franck Martin (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jared Mauch (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 14)
