nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 12:43:17 +0200
On 2010-05-15 05:32, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Michael Ulitskiy<mulitskiy () acedsl com> wrote:So my question still stands: is anyone aware of a reasonable tunneled ipv6 transit service (I mean aside from HE tunnel broker)? The load will be really light. I don't expect we'll break a few Mbit/s in the nearest future and when we do then I guess it'll be the time to look for the native transit.beware the uTorrent ... (see johnb's notes about this) sixxs i think also had NYC based tunnel boxes, no?
usewr01 is Newark, thus quite close. uschi02 is Chicago (UN/LOCODE++) thus not really around the corner unless you compare it to Tokio...
SixXS never does transit/BGP though*. We only provide IPv6 connectivity to end-sites, thus to solve the problem where the last-mile cannot be IPv6 enabled, which is the general case for businesses and home users where their ISP didn't come around to enabling IPv6 (CPE's, DSLAM's, DOCSIS, it is getting there, but still generally a b**** ;)
(* = http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=bgppeering)Core networks should be non-tunneled. It is silly to have to need a tunnel to another network to get IPv6 uplink connectivity.
If you really are in a position that nobody else in the IXs you are present at can provide native IPv6 connectivity, then well, you should have started yelling about this years ago.
See http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit with relevant links to the awesome peeringdb to figure out from whom you could be directly
Yes, a tunnel is a good last-resort, but one is better off pushing for native IPv6. As for doing tunneled-BGP, come kids, the 6bone got shut down 4 years ago, for a reason...
As for the places that you can't get native IPv6 transit, two words: business opportunity.That should light up the eyes of the folks who didn't realize what IPv6 is for some companies... there is an obvious example of a certain company which is playing their cards pretty well there, the question for them is though how long they can survive when the real big boys turn on their marketing engines, time will tell.
[..]
and I think kloch @carpathia was doing some of this for a time, though perhaps only ASH/PHX ?
He is the one providing usqas01 (the IPv4/hosting part). Ping him directly though for other things. Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Randy Bush (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Graham Beneke (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jeroen Massar (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 17)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Franck Martin (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jared Mauch (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 14)
- RE: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Eric Van Tol (May 17)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Karl Auer (May 14)
