nanog mailing list archives
Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:49:38 -0400
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:47:52PM -0400, Greg Whynott wrote:
how many of you are using SPF records? Do you have an opinion on their use/non use of?
1. Not using them, and don't have any (observed) problems despite years of closely monitoring mail logs looking for just such issues. 2. Note that they don't stop spam, don't stop forgery, and don't prevent backscatter (aka outscatter). [Similar/related technologies have similar/related problems, so these points aren't really SPF-specific.] 3. As others have pointed out, you can just easily be DoS'd when using them as you could be without. ---Rsk
Current thread:
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408), (continued)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) John Adams (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Stefan Bethke (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Douglas Otis (Oct 05)
- RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)
