nanog mailing list archives

Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)


From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:05:12 -0400

dig throwaway1.com NS
dig throwaway2.com NS

etc etc ... and then check_sender_ns_access in postfix, for example.

Scales much better than whackamoling one domain after the other on the same NS

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:59 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

140 million .coms. Throw-away domains. I do believe that Marcus Ranum had
"trying to enumerate badness" on his list of "Six stupidest security ideas".
This won't scale as long as you have more spammers adding new domains faster
than your NOC staff can add them to the blacklist.

(And even centralized blacklists run by dedicated organizations haven't solved
the problem yet, so I'm not holding my breath waiting for that to work out...)



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)


Current thread: