nanog mailing list archives
Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:05:12 -0400
dig throwaway1.com NS dig throwaway2.com NS etc etc ... and then check_sender_ns_access in postfix, for example. Scales much better than whackamoling one domain after the other on the same NS On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:59 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
140 million .coms. Throw-away domains. I do believe that Marcus Ranum had "trying to enumerate badness" on his list of "Six stupidest security ideas". This won't scale as long as you have more spammers adding new domains faster than your NOC staff can add them to the blacklist. (And even centralized blacklists run by dedicated organizations haven't solved the problem yet, so I'm not holding my breath waiting for that to work out...)
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) John Adams (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) John Adams (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
