nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP next-hop
From: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks () poggs co uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:04:13 +0100
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:01 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I have suggested more than a few times to vendors that the command: show bgp ipv4 unicast 100.10.0.0/16 why-chosen Would be insanely useful.
+1 for that, in a similar manner to packet-tracer on ASAs. Peter
Current thread:
- BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- RE: BGP next-hop Jeff Saxe (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Leo Bicknell (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Peter Hicks (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Franck Martin (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Brett Watson (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Peter Hicks (Sep 30)
- RE: BGP next-hop Jeff Saxe (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Christian Martin (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Smith W. Stacy (Sep 30)
