nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP next-hop
From: Franck Martin <franck () genius com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Because the path was broken everytime the bgp session was established and rewriting the routing table with more
specific routes?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com>
To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Thursday, 30 September, 2010 2:37:43 PM
Subject: Re: BGP next-hop
i was recently bitten by a cousin of this
research router getting an ebgp multi-hop full feed from 147.28.0.1
(address is relevant)
it is on a lan with a default gateway 42.666.77.11 (address not
relevant), so it has
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 42.666.77.11
massive flapping results.
it seems it gets the bgp route for 147.28.0.0/16 and then can not
resolve the next hop. it would not recurse to the default exit.
of course it was solved by
ip route 147.28.0.0 255.255.0.0 42.666.77.11
but i do not really understand in my heart why i needed to do this.
randy
Current thread:
- BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- RE: BGP next-hop Jeff Saxe (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Leo Bicknell (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Peter Hicks (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Franck Martin (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Brett Watson (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Peter Hicks (Sep 30)
- RE: BGP next-hop Jeff Saxe (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Christian Martin (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Smith W. Stacy (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 30)
