nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enterprise Internet - Question
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:03:37 -0700
On Jul 14, 2011, at 2:35 PM, david raistrick wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Jeff Cartier wrote:- Does the idea of having local Internet at each site make more sense? If so why?IME, costs for private backhaul circuits of any flavor are significantly higher than costs for plain internet access - so backhauling internet access (unless you have extremely restrictive access policies that you can actually enforce) through your WAN would/should cost through the nose. Routing only WAN traffic through the WAN reduces the size/scope/impact on those more expensive circuits. Probably at the expense of additional complexity, of course.
In fact, it is often more cost effective to multihome each site and use VPNs for your WAN. Owen
Current thread:
- Enterprise Internet - Question Jeff Cartier (Jul 14)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Phil Sykes (Jul 14)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- RE: Enterprise Internet - Question Jeff Cartier (Jul 15)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question PC (Jul 15)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- RE: Enterprise Internet - Question Jeff Cartier (Jul 15)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question david raistrick (Jul 14)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Jimmy Hess (Jul 14)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Alastair Johnson (Jul 15)
- Re: Enterprise Internet - Question Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
