nanog mailing list archives

Re: Enterprise Internet - Question


From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:51:19 -0600

Perhaps you have Canadian branches feeding off the same connection and they
will have the reverse problem with geo-location?



On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Jeff Cartier <
Jeff.Cartier () pernod-ricard com> wrote:

Thanks for the comments everyone.  They are much appreciated.
In regards to changing the address of our ARIN block to a US office
address....are their any trades-offs in doing that?  Just curious.


-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:02 PM
To: Jeff Cartier
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Enterprise Internet - Question


On Jul 14, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Jeff Cartier wrote:

Hi All,

I just wanted to throw a question out to the list...

In our data center we feed Internet to some of our US based offices and
every now and again we receive complaints that they can't access some US
based Internet content because they are coming from a Canadian based IP.

This has sparked an interesting discussion around a few questions....of
which I'd like to hear the lists opinions on.

-          How should/can an enterprise deal with accessibility to
internet content issues? (ie. that whole coming from a Canadian IP accessing
US content)


This is an example of why content restriction based on IP address
geolocation is such a bad idea in general.

Frankly, the easiest thing to do (since most Canadian companies aren't as
brain-dead) is to update your whois records with the address of the block
allocated to your datacenter so that it looks like it's in one of your US
offices. I realize this sounds silly for a variety of reasons, but, it
solves the problem without expensive or configuration-intensive workarounds
such as selective NAT, etc.

o   Side question on that - Could we simply obtain a US based IP address
and selectively NAT?

You can, but, you can also hit yourself over the head repeatedly with a
hammer. Selective NAT will yield more content, but, the pain levels will
probably be similar.

-          Does the idea of regional Internet locations make sense?  If
so, when do they make sense?  For instance, having a hub site in South
America (ie. Brazil) and having all offices in Venezuela, Peru and Argentina
route through a local Internet feed in Brazil.


Not really. The whole content-restriction by IP geolocation thing also
doesn't make sense. Unfortunately, the fact that something is nonsensical
does not prevent someone from doing it or worse, selling it.

You should do what makes sense for the economics of the topology you need.
The address geolocation issues can usually be best addressed by manipulating
whois. If your address block from ARIN is an allocation, you can manipulate
sub-block address registration issues through the use of SWIP, for example.

-          Does the idea of having local Internet at each site make more
sense?  If so why?


That's really more of an economic and policy question within your
organization than a technical one.


Owen



__________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail contains proprietary information some or all of
which may be legally privileged.  It is for the intended recipient only. If
an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please
notify the author by replying to this e-mail.  If you are not the intended
recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely on
this e-mail.

This message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses, Spam,
and Explicit Content.





Current thread: