nanog mailing list archives
Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right"
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:33:01 -0700
On 05/06/11 9:59 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 6/5/2011 8:11 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:The problem is that even stating that denying access to the internet violates human rights allows the UN to begin to get it's claws into regulating the internet. These guys want it to be a right? I'm forwarding the UNSG my home DSL bill. Let him pay it.On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:This is the same organization that says there is no basic human right to keep and bear arms. They have no standing to lecture us about human rights, asThe title is misleading, as this is more about "denying" access. But this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediatelyworried. I figure it warrants a discussion.their body largely consists of mass murderers and thieves.Not that I don't agree it's criminal for a tyrant to disconnect their countryfrom the Internet, but they are tyrants after all.
There's a significant difference between Internet "access" and Internet "service". I have access to the roads. But that doesn't magically get me vehicular transportation from place A to place B. I need to buy a bus ticket, or buy a car and gasoline, in order to get service over these roads to transport myself from place A to place B.
When the UN says that Internet access is a human right, they aren't saying it should be provided for free, but they are saying that it should be available (for those who can afford a service fee), and more importantly that cutting it off for political purposes should be treated as a violation of human rights of freedom of assembly and communication. In the 1700s the US revolution and subsequent state formation (the United States of America) was created first by people assembling at public halls and private houses. In 2011, the Arab Spring revolutions have taken place by public assemblies that were initially organized in internet forums (Facebook, Twitter, private blogs, etc.). I do not see anything wrong with the UN position on Internet access.
jc
Current thread:
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right", (continued)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 05)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Andrew D Kirch (Jun 05)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Jimmy Hess (Jun 06)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Andrew Kirch (Jun 06)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" George Herbert (Jun 06)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Hank Nussbacher (Jun 06)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Jay Ashworth (Jun 06)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Andrew D Kirch (Jun 05)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Jay Ashworth (Jun 06)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" JC Dill (Jun 05)
- Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right" Joly MacFie (Jun 06)
- Re: UN declares Internet access a "human right" JC Dill (Jun 05)
- RE: UN declares Internet access a "human right" George Bonser (Jun 05)
