nanog mailing list archives

Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a "human right"


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:11:42 -0400

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:48:56 EDT, Bryan Fields said:
On 6/5/2011 20:44, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400 Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net> wrote:
This is the same organization that says there is no basic human right to keep
and bear arms. They have no standing to lecture us about human rights, as
their body largely consists of mass murderers and thieves.

- PLONK
What a moron

Nice to see you took the time to form a well thought out and concise argument

OK, if you need it spelled out for you - you asked for it. :)

"The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first
object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether
we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a
government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter."
                        --- Thomas Jefferson

Concise enough for you?  You may also want to investigate the relative
importance of communications and armaments in Ghandi's struggle for a free
India, the US civil rights movement, and the collapse of the Soviet Union.
That's 3 examples of change mediated by communications without rifles.  Then
there's Darfur - an example of rifles without communications infrastructure.

Oh, and as Bryan said... 'PLONK'.



Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: