nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why don't ISPs peer with everyone?


From: Jérôme Nicolle <jerome () ceriz fr>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 02:08:01 +0200

2011/6/7 Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>:

(a) Costs of peering;  both in terms of administrative overhead,
ports, circuits, cabinet space,...

The cost of peering on an IXP is roughly the same as setup fees for a
new transit, and a BGP session to an IXP route server is not far from
what will a full view cost in RAM and CPU on your edges.

(B) Loss of revenue due to peering.  An extreme example is a very
large ISP peering
with a small ISP, to allow the small ISP to reach large ISP's customers.
The large ISP loses revenue, if they provide the peering for free,
since it would mean
the small ISP is not paying for that transit.

Large ISPs do buy transit too. On a financial perspective, it can be
considered as "outsourcing the peering function", with a paid SLA for
this connectivity...

And once a customer, never a peer.

Never peer with one of your peer's customer is one basic rule of
peering agreements between tier-2 and 1 networks.

It's a shame financial pragmatism makes the Internet less "meshy", and
thus more fragile...


-- 
Jérôme Nicolle


Current thread: