nanog mailing list archives
Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration?
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:09:13 +0500
As per IPv6 prefixes announced by AS9583 via bgp.he.net - http://bgp.he.net/AS9583#_prefixes6 we can see multiple /64s.
The question is why their upstreams are accepting /64? It shouldn't be at all otherwise just imagine how many /64s you have to deal with once IPv6 is in full swing. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui
Current thread:
- Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Anurag Bhatia (Jul 08)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Graham Beneke (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Aftab Siddiqui (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Joel jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Frank Habicht (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Joel jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Justin M. Streiner (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? Justin M. Streiner (Jul 09)
- Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration? NIG NOG (Jul 09)
