Re: Any advantage of announcing IPv6/64s Or purely misconfiguration?

[Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>]

On 7/9/2012 10:45 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 7/9/12 00:09 , Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> > > As per IPv6 prefixes announced by AS9583 via bgp.he.net -
> > > http://bgp.he.net/AS9583#_prefixes6 we can see multiple /64s.
>
> you likely won't see them in your table though.

as direct customer of 6453 I see them.  :-(
before starting to filter.
6453: will you filter them?

Frank

#sh bgp ipv6 u 2001:0E48::/32 lo
BGP table version is 2543917, local router ID is 41.188.128.35
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x
best-external, f RT-Filter, a additional-path
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i2001:E48::/32    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 i
*>i2001:E48:0:1::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:2::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:4::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:5::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:6::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:7::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?
*>i2001:E48:0:8::/64
                    2001:5A0:C00:400::5
                                             0     30      0 6453 9583 ?