nanog mailing list archives

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:12:06 -0400 (EDT)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com>

In my neighborhood, Comcast has a monopoly on coax cable tv and HFC
internet services. There are no regulations that support that
monopoly. Another company could, theoretically, apply, receive
permits, and build out a second cable system if they wanted to.
However, the population density is such that even if that company
captured 50% of the market, it would merely make the market
economically unviable for both companies.

In such instances, you do indeed have “natural monopolies” which are
an economic construct, not a regulatory artifact.

And if this were not true, Verizon wouldn't have agitated to get it made
illegal in 19 states for the local municipality to be the owner of that
"natural monopoly" transport network; see also my month long thread on 
that topic and it's second and third order resultants in late 2012.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: