nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software Defined Networking
From: Tyler Mills <me () tylermills net>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:35:37 +0000
Would be hard to prove that you implicitly agreed to the constraints mentioned within the email by just merely receiving it and reading it. Even EULA's require you to check a box or click "I Accept." On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 2:30 PM Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon () cox net> wrote:
On 9/4/2015 12:57, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to: 220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal disclaimers are null and void. 220 You also agree that I am awesome.I like that. Unfortunately, I no longer operate a mail host. I have been trying to figure out how to mechanically route messages containing them to the spam sump. IANAL, but I thing an interesting case would be trying to enforce that crap in a situation involving unsolicited email (as in this case). -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
Current thread:
- Re: Software Defined Networking, (continued)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Bevan Slattery (Sep 09)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Tom Hill (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Pawel Rybczyk (Sep 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Aaron C. de Bruyn (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking alvin nanog (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Rich Kulawiec (Sep 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networking John Levine (Sep 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Software Defined Networking Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Tyler Mills (Sep 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networking Jared Mauch (Sep 05)
