nanog mailing list archives
Re: Extending network over a dry pair
From: Jeremy Austin <jhaustin () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:38:10 -0900
For a comparison of distance to capacity on copper, see http://www.impulse-corp.co.uk/knowledge-base/transmission-distance-and-speed-differences-between-shdsl-and-vdsl2.htm You might be able to pair bond -- if you had more than one pair. If wireless isn't possible, you're likely needing satellite. On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:35 PM Andrew Latham <lathama () gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:27 PM Nick Bogle <nick () bogle se> wrote:A quick question for you guys; If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't cutting it anymore. Unfortunately it's a research site on a federally protected wildlife preserve so we can't run any new infrastructure (fiber etc) and it isn't in a geographical place where point to point wireless is practical. We were thinking there is some sort of network extender that uses some form of DSL for higher bandwidth capacity. Any suggestions?Look for an SHDSL Ethernet Extender -- - Andrew "lathama" Latham -
-- Jeremy Austin jhaustin () gmail com (907) 895-2311 office (907) 803-5422 cell
Current thread:
- Extending network over a dry pair Nick Bogle (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Andrew Latham (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jeremy Austin (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Marshall, Quincy (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jeremy Austin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Ray Van Dolson (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Josh Luthman (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Mel Beckman (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Blake Hudson (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Phillip Carroll (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Chris Kimball (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Phillip Carroll (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Alfie Pates (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 12)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Andrew Latham (Dec 12)
