nanog mailing list archives
Re: Extending network over a dry pair
From: Alfie Pates <alfie@fdx.services>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:42:29 +0000
Six miles is probably pushing it, but Proscend make some interesting Long- Range Ethernet SFP transciever which are VDSL based. They're horrendously documented and they draw *way* more power than the SFP specification allows. They also make a version which is design to terminate VDSL broadband circuits - A couple of those found their way to my desk recently and it turns out that despite the horrendous documentation and sightly scary heat output (they come with a little paper note in the box which says something along the lines of "WARNING! MODULE GETS HOT - DO NOT TOUCH DURING OPERATION."), they do generally Just Work! ~a On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, at 9:25 PM, Nick Bogle wrote:
A quick question for you guys; If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't cutting it anymore. Unfortunately it's a research site on a federally protected wildlife preserve so we can't run any new infrastructure (fiber etc) and it isn't in a geographical place where point to point wireless is practical. We were thinking there is some sort of network extender that uses some form of DSL for higher bandwidth capacity.> Any suggestions?
Current thread:
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair, (continued)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Andrew Latham (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jeremy Austin (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Marshall, Quincy (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jeremy Austin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Ray Van Dolson (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Josh Luthman (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Mel Beckman (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Blake Hudson (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Phillip Carroll (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Chris Kimball (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Phillip Carroll (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Alfie Pates (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Baldur Norddahl (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jameson, Daniel (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Andrew Latham (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair William Herrin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair William Herrin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Dan Hollis (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Mike Hammett (Dec 13)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Tim Pozar (Dec 13)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Dan Hollis (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Miles Fidelman (Dec 12)
