nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news


From: "Badiei, Farzaneh" <farzi () gatech edu>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:42:40 +0000

The privacy implications that WHOIS had for domain name registrants was not only acknowledged by Europe. For a long 
time we were in a battle to get minimum privacy for domain registrants and the privacy proxy services provided some 
sort of relief. But the intellectual property interest with the backing of governments always dominated the 
discussions. otherwise IETF had recognized the privacy issues of WHOIS as early as 2002 and protocols were recommended 
that could respect registrants privacy rights.

This was not solely a European issue. It was a global issue and with GDPR coming into effect it only made the process 
faster and diluted the power of ip people and those who were piggy backing on their power. It's time to move on. GDPR 
is not a great law but a community that for so many years violated the privacy rights of domain name registrants had to 
be somehow stopped. It's unfortunate that we didn't deal with this through innovative ways... But  saying Europe and 
GDPR brought this upon us is false.

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Brian Kantor <Brian () ampr org>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 10:23:22 AM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

An article in The Register on the current status of Whois and the GDPR.

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/16/whois_privacy_shambles/


Current thread: