nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
From: Roger Marquis <marquis () roble com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 07:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Dan Hollis wrote:
How about the ones with broken contact data - deliberately or not? A whois blacklist sounds good to me. DNS WBL?
Many sites are already doing this locally. It's just a matter of time before Spamhaus or an up-and-coming entity has an RBL for it. The data is perhaps not precise enough for a blacklist but obfuscated whois records are certainly useful in calculating the reputation of ingress/egress SMTP, HTTP and other services. This is not a new idea and similar to the (unmaintained?) whois.abuse.net contact lookup service, razor/pyzor, and other useful SIEM and Spamassassin inputs. Roger Marquis
Current thread:
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news, (continued)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mark Rousell (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Joly MacFie (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Constantine A. Murenin (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Rob Evans (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Brian Kantor (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Niels Bakker (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Stephen Satchell (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Badiei, Farzaneh (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 23)
