nanog mailing list archives

Re: RIPE our of IPv4


From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:31:56 -0500

On Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:04:24 -0800, Fred Baker said:

I believe that Dmitry's point is that we will still require IPv4 addresses for new
organizations deploying dual-stack

I think I understood what you meant, but not what you said.

If someone is dual stack, they are IPv6-capable and IPv4-capable.

And they're going to need v4 addresses to be v4-capable, aren't there?

A new corporation that's trying to spin up dual-stack is going to need 2
address allocations, a v4 and a v6.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: