nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: Large Hadron Collider <large.hadron.collider () gmx com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:46:05 -0800
that would be a throwback, if my MTA supported full-length bangpaths. On 19-12-04 01 h 56, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 14:43, Randy Bush <randy () psg com <mailto:randy () psg com>> wrote: > Why does a new organisation need to have any global IPv4 addresses of > their own at all? if all folk saying such things would make their in- and out-bound mail servers v6-only, it would reduce confusion in this area. randy ...!6to4mx!m2xenix!randy Aled
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4, (continued)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 bzs (Dec 01)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Justin Streiner (Dec 01)
- US Broadband IPv6 (Re: RIPE out of IPv4) Jared Mauch (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Willy Manga (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Randy Bush (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Aled Morris via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Large Hadron Collider (Dec 05)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 02)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fernando Gont (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Brandon Martin (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Message not available
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 03)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Fred Baker (Dec 03)
