nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTP for ASBRs?
From: Job Snijders <job () ntt net>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 14:37:43 +0200
Dear Lars, On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:56:33AM +0200, Lars Prehn wrote:
do you NTP sync your AS boundary routers?
yes
If so, what are incentives for doing so? Are there incentives, e.g. security considerations, not to do it?
The major advantage of NTP syncing your routers is that it allows you to more effectively correlate any log messages that these devices emit to log messages other devices generated. Did two events happen at separate times, or was it perhaps the same event at the same time? the incentive is ease of troubleshooting. on this topic, i strongly recommend to operate all devices in the Etc/UTC timezone, this makes coordination with external entities much easier. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- NTP for ASBRs? Lars Prehn (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Job Snijders (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Christopher Morrow (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Vincent Bernat (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Kenneth McRae via NANOG (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Mark Tinka (May 08)
- RE: NTP for ASBRs? adamv0025 (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? John Kristoff (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Scott Weeks (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Bryan Holloway (May 08)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Job Snijders (May 08)
