nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTP for ASBRs?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 10:34:34 -0400
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:38 AM Job Snijders <job () ntt net> wrote:
Dear Lars, On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:56:33AM +0200, Lars Prehn wrote:do you NTP sync your AS boundary routers?yesIf so, what are incentives for doing so? Are there incentives, e.g. security considerations, not to do it?The major advantage of NTP syncing your routers is that it allows you to more effectively correlate any log messages that these devices emit to log messages other devices generated.
Note that if you step into the wonderful world of streaming telemetry you MAY need to worry about certificate validation and time becomes important for that. Similarly any other usages of certificates on the devices will bring with it a stricter time regime.
Current thread:
- NTP for ASBRs? Lars Prehn (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Job Snijders (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Christopher Morrow (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Vincent Bernat (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Kenneth McRae via NANOG (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Mark Tinka (May 08)
- RE: NTP for ASBRs? adamv0025 (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? John Kristoff (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Scott Weeks (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Bryan Holloway (May 08)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Valdis Klētnieks (May 08)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: NTP for ASBRs? Job Snijders (May 08)
